For greater than a yr, Tesla has shielded particulars about its robotaxi crashes from public view. Now, the corporate has printed new particulars in a federal database about 17 incidents, which came about between July 2025 and March 2026. In a minimum of two of them, Tesla’s human workers seem to have performed a hand within the crashes by remotely driving the in any other case autonomous automobiles into objects on the road.
In each crashes, which occurred in Austin, “security displays” have been within the autos’ passenger seats to oversee the still-fledgling self-driving tech, and no passengers have been using within the automobiles. Each crashes occurred at speeds under 10 miles per hour. The brand new particulars have been first reported by TechCrunch.
In a single incident, which came about in July 2025, the security monitor skilled “minor” accidents after a distant employee drove the Tesla up a curb and right into a metallic fence at 8 mph. The monitor, who had requested assist from Tesla’s distant driving workforce after the automotive stopped on the facet of a road and wouldn’t transfer ahead, was not hospitalized, Tesla reported.
The opposite incident, in January 2026, occurred after a security monitor requested navigation assist from the distant workforce. The distant driver took management and drove the automotive straight into a brief building barricade at 9 mph. The crash left the robotaxi’s entrance left fender and tire scraped up, however Tesla didn’t report any accidents.
Tesla, which doesn’t have a public relations workforce, didn’t reply to WIRED’s request for remark.
The brand new particulars draw consideration to an usually misunderstood however safety-critical a part of autonomous car operations: the human backstops who remotely monitor the robotic automobiles and intervene once they get into bother. All US self-driving operators keep these distant groups, based on letters submitted to a US senator earlier this yr. However Tesla seems to be an outlier as a result of it extra continuously permits these distant employees to straight drive the automobiles.
Different firms sometimes enable their employees to remotely present enter to the autonomous car software program, which the system can select to make use of or reject. (Waymo says that specifically skilled employees can remotely drive its automobiles as much as 2 mph, however said in February that it hadn’t used that performance exterior of coaching.)
Security advocates have raised questions about remote driving, which may be difficult in locations with out constant mobile connectivity and in contexts the place distant drivers want an ideal understanding of a automotive’s environment to information it out of advanced conditions.
The brand new particulars on the 2 Tesla crashes “elevate questions on what the teleoperator can see in each protection and determination, and what sort of latency they’re experiencing whereas driving,” Noah Goodall, an impartial self-driving car researcher, tells WIRED in a message.
Tesla’s still-fledgling robotaxi service is working in three Texas cities: Austin, Dallas, and Houston. However the service has fewer than 100 autos working in complete, in comparison with Waymo’s practically 4,000. Lower than half of Tesla’s automobiles seem to function and not using a security monitor sitting within the passenger seat. Reuters reported this week that service wait instances in Houston and Dallas, the place robotaxis launched in April, are upward of 35 minutes. Even in Austin, the place the automobiles have been carrying passengers for nearly a yr, a reporter for the publication discovered that robotaxis have been generally fully unavailable.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has said that autonomous autos and robotics are the automaker’s focus as a substitute of producing electrical automobiles. Musk’s compensation—a possible $1 trillion paycheck by 2035—is now tied to car and robotic deliveries, in addition to gross sales of not-yet-released self-driving subscriptions and the variety of robotaxis in business operation.